(Ir)religiosity

theology | philosophy | culture

Engaging Jesus for President 4: render unto Caesar

Comments

 

Part I | Part II | Part III

Jesus and taxes.  

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people defend blind trust and obedience in their government by appealing to Jesus’ statement: “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s” (my paraphrase), which seems at the surface to be in support of the empire.  But that misses the larger picture.

Coins with Caesar’s image on them were all over the place in Jesus’ day and were inscribed with the statement: “Long live the Son of God!” According to C&H, “The coins were a visual sign that the entire economy belonged to Caesar and that without him everything would fall apart.” The Jews were taxed heavily by the Roman government both directly through Pilate and Herod and indirectly by the temple authorities.  C&H estimate that over 50% of the common persons income when to Caesar in some form of taxes. 

So here we are with Jesus in a rift with the authorities again.  They ask him if it is right to pay homage to the empire through taxes.  Here, C&H bring up an excellent point, one I hadn’t ever thought about, though it makes perfect sense: “…it was quite radical to speak of God and Caesar as two separate entities.”  By doing so Jesus raises the question to his hearers: Who is God, really? Because of course as mentioned in the previous posts Caesar was God. Period.  End of question.  So, to us on the surface level Jesus is supporting the tax system, but to his hearers he is questioning the very nature of God.

And Jesus’ hears would likely push that question to the next level: if Caesar is not God, then what actually belongs to Caesar?  If Caesar is not God, that is, not the ruler of the universe then what authority and what jurisdiction does he really have?  Caesar authority is illegitimate!  As C&H put it:

“Caesar could brand with his image, coins, crowns, and robes, which moths would eat and rust destroy.  But life and creation have God’s stamp on them.  Caesar could have his coins, but life is God’s.  Caesar had no right to take what is God’s.  We are also reminded that just as Caesar stamped his image of coins, God’s image is stamped on human beings.  Even Caesar had God’s stamp.  God made Caesar, and Caesar was not God. But the hearer was left to ponder the riddle of what was God’s and what was Caesar’s. No wonder Jesus often had to say, “Do you have ears to hear?”…God created Caesar, and God created the heavens and the earth. Caesar cannot do that. Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s. Once we’ve given to God what is God’s, there’s not much left for Caesar. And after Caesar returns to dust, God will continue to live and bring dust to life.”

Now, at this point I have to wonder how this works itself out today.  I live in the American empire. I sent my tax returns off about a month ago.  I got a refund.  To be honest, I’m very grateful for that refund because my wife and I will be moving across the country this summer and we need all the help we can get.  But that doesn’t change the fact that my refund money is imperial money.

I can think of two alternatives.  On the one hand, I can could opt out of the system all together and refuse to pay taxes or mail a return.  People do that.  And I respect them.  But I think the second alternative is more viable and effective.  I think it makes more of a statement.  A comment Matt Scott made on one of my posts about a month ago got me to thinking.   And then I read this book and I got to thinking even more.

What if next year when I have to pay taxes and render unto Uncle Sam what is his, what if I refuse to pay the percentage that funds the war and “national defense?”  What if I attached I cover letter to my return explaining that because my loyalty lies with God I refuse to participate in the killing innocent people.  What if instead I took the percentage that would go to fund war and I gave it all away?  

I can’t help, but wonder what might happen if I took Jesus at his word.  I can’t help but wonder what might happened if I believed him.

Better yet, what would happen if we believed him? What would happen if we were actually converted by the gospel and became cooperators and participators with God in subverting empire?

Am I crazy? Delusional? Too idealistic?

What do you think?

Written by Blake Huggins

May 6th, 2008 at 1:30 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

  • Roman Pytel
    We have two contradictory sources regarding John the Baptist's death. According to canonical Gospels John the Baptist was beheaded because he dared condemn Herod's marriage to Herodias, the wife of Herod's brother Philip (Luke 3:19; Matthew 14:3-5; Mk 6:24, 27).
    But Josephus Flavius in his Jewish Antiquities stated that Herod killed John to preempt a possible uprising: “Herod feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion, (For they seemed ready to do any thing he should advise).” Unlike Jesus, John the Baptist would not advise his fellow Jews to “render unto Caesar...”

    From the Royal Budget for Jesus

    “And it came to pass afterward, that he went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him. And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils, and Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod’s steward (Chuza was King Herod’s business manager and was in charge of his palace and domestic affairs), and Susanna, and many others, who gave him of their wealth for his needs. “ (Mark. 8:1-3). Interestingly, some early Christian mosaics depict Jesus in uniform of a Roman legionary.
    A unique image of Jesus was preserved on an emerald cutting sent to be engraved by order of the Roman Emperor Tiberius. It comes from the treasure of Constantinople and was surrendered by the Sultan of Turkey to Pope Innocent VIII as ransom payment for the brother held captive by the Christians The attached image has been taken directly from the priceless emerald belonging to the Vatican Treasury. (http://www.gnosticteachings.org/the-gnostic-jesus/) Tiberius (42 B.C.E.- A.D. 37) was the emperor of Rome during the life of Jesus Christ.
  • @ matt. right on. money talks, both ways. i'd like to think that i'll actually do this, but i've wussed out on things before. so we'll see come next year. i hope i'm not all talk.
  • Good thoughts, but I'll be honest. I don't have the cahones to not pay the full portion of my taxes. I'm sure that says plenty about me, but I just wouldn't be able to bring myself to doing so. But I don't think you're crazy or delusional to do so, and I will reiterate that I feel like money is the mover, and when money dries up changes happen.
blog comments powered by Disqus