Archive for December, 2009
Postmodern Eschatology?
I ran across this quote from Jürgen Moltmann last night while doing some research for my last written statement in constructive theology for the semester.
Christian eschatology must separate itself from the messianism of the modern world, and out of this world’s ruins must rescue the categories of redemption. God for a Secular Society, 220.
It seems to me that one of the biggest theological challenges facing us today is speaking of eschatology in light of postmodernism. If Lyotard‘s critique of metanarratives is correct it would seem to spell the end of eschatology broadly conceived. For Moltmann, however, eschatology could not be more important as it is the very medium and content of all theological discourse.
So the question then becomes the following one: what is the ultimate Christian hope in the face of the failed and indeed violent narratives of the modern world, how can the Christian narrative be freed from those totalizing narratives, and how does it, at its core, differ from them? What is its good news? I think Moltmann is on to something here. Yet I wonder how or if it is even possible to distinguish the Christian narrative from these other stories ontologically. That is, how to speak of the Christian narrative without totalization. In many ways this gets back to the question I asked a few months ago about whether Christianity is intrinsically a metanarrative. Or does it spell freedom from the metanarrative?
I’m still working out where I come down on this, but it seems to me that eschatology is where the rubber meets the road as far as the interface between theology and postmodernism is concerned.
Thoughts?
Transforming Christian Theology [2]
Chapter One: Things Have Changed, or “Toto, We’re Not in Kansas Anymore”

In part one, Clayton comments a bit more on his introductory claims that the theological enterprise is in a crisis of language and content. Chapter one tells the familiar but sobering story of the changing face of American religion — read the crumbling of Christendom — in the twentieth century. Fifty or so years ago was, in Clayton’s words, “the Golden Age for the American Church” where “church social events stood at the center of [one's] social” and religious identity and was tantamount to one’s classification in larger society (12). In other words, being Christian was the ultimate signifier of ‘being a good American.’
Of course, that began to fracture in the 60s and 70s as American culture began to radically change and disseminate into many different directions. No longer was there a single religious option which comprised one’s whole identity, now there was a smorgasbord of various options. Nevertheless, as Clayton claims, “all these options were options in organized religion” (13).
Today, standing at the cusp of a new century we see this cultural fragmentation and religious dissemination writ large. And the mainline decline that began in the 60s is reaching a disturbing rate for those interested in business as normal in the church. Clayton cites a recent Pew Poll from just last year to draw attention to the ever-increasing number of the “religiously unaffiliated” and the shift from mainline Protestant dominance in the middle of the last century, to our current situation of widespread religious fragmentation. Whereas the options 30-40 years ago were will situated within the confines of organized religion, the options today have literally “exploded” in our faces. The free-market of religious ideas is alive and well.
All this presents an important and pressing problem for the church, a true crisis of identity. Further, this explosion of religious variety is only the beginning and as far as Clayton is concerned technology will be the decisive factor in the future. As he states toward the end of the chapter, “what it means to be the church today, and what it will mean over the coming two to three decades, is affected just as strongly by the explosion of new technologies and the radically new forms of social networking that they create” (15). Indeed, the flattening of reality and the radical democratization of information that comes with technology is a direct challenge not only to the old forms of “doing church” (practitioners) but the old forms of “doing theology” (academics) as well. And if those forms are in decline now, the will be completely obsolete in the future. As the decline of traditional denominations suggests, people simply aren’t interested in participating in forms of church rooted in a world that no longer exists. As Clayton concludes:
No wonder people feel a little strange participating in a social arrangement called the “local congregation,” a structure designed for the world of the eighteenth century, before there were cars or even light bulbs! (15)
The good news, at least in my mind, is the Christianity — specifically the kingdom of God – has always been flexible and adaptable to new cultural changes, in fact that may be intrinsic to its character. The problem is that too often the church is reluctant and hesitant to do so. Nevertheless, there are new forms taking shape and I believe that if we begin to provide persons with the tools to come up with new, creative ways of doing church and fresh, imaginative theological language that goes places we haven’t been before, then we will find those pockets of reality in which the kingdom is thriving in the future.
Be sure to check out these other theo-bloggers!
Joseph Weethee , Jonathan Bartlett, The Church Geek, Jacob’s Cafe, Reverend Mommy, Steve Knight, Todd Littleton, Christina Accornero, John David Ryan, LeAnn Gunter Johns, Chase Andre, Matt Moorman, Gideon Addington, Ryan Dueck, Rachel Marszalek, Amy Moffitt, Josh Wallace, Jonathan Dodson, Stephen Barkley, Monty Galloway, Colin McEnroe, Tad DeLay, David Mullens, Kimberly Roth, Tripp Hudgins, Tripp Fuller, Greg Horton, Andrew Tatum, Drew Tatusko, Sam Andress, Susan Barnes, Jared Enyart, Jake Bouma, Eliacin Rosario-Cruz, Blake Huggins, Lance Green, Scott Lenger, Dan Rose, Thomas Turner, Les Chatwin, Joseph Carson, Brian Brandsmeier, J. D. Allen, Greg Bolt, Tim Snyder, Matthew L. Kelley, Carl McLendon, Carter McNeese, David R. Gillespie, Arthur Stewart, Tim Thompson, Joe Bumbulis, Bob Cornwall
This Tour is Sponsored by Transforming Theology DOT org!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6f17b2ac-cd9f-4fd8-8559-e0f0c3e0c181)

